A Generalization of Two-Player Stackelberg Games to Three Players
نویسنده
چکیده
Two-player Stackelberg games and their applications to security are currently a very hot topic in the field of Algorithmic Game Theory [7]. In two-player Stackelberg games, instead of having the players move simultaneously, one player is designated as the leader and one as the follower. The game then works as follows: the leader chooses a strategy (possibly mixed) to commit to which the follower observes before choosing his response. A large part of the appeal of two-player Stackelberg games is the fact that they can be solved using linear programming in polynomial time in the size of the game [3]. One obvious question then, is whether or not this tractability can be extended to Stackelberg games with more players. This is addressed somewhat in [2], however the model presented relies on the followers obeying a signal from the leader, which is a very strong assumption. In this paper, I propose an alternative model with weaker assumptions and then analyze its complexity.
منابع مشابه
Investigating the Effect of Rewards on Individual Players' Efforts: A Behavioral Approach
The main goal of the study is to examine the effect of rewards on the behavior of players in a team activity. In this framework, by performing 12 sequential and simultaneous games in a laboratory environment examine the rewarding effect on players' behavior. Students from Yazd universities surveyed and the sample of 182 students is in the form of two groups, which collected in total for 2184 ma...
متن کاملReputation with Long Run Players
Previous work shows that reputation results may fail in repeated games with long-run players with equal discount factors. We restrict attention to stage games where two players, with equal discount factors, move sequentially. A pure Stackelberg action is assumed to exist. One and two sided reputation results are provided. If one of the players is a Stackelberg type with positive probability, th...
متن کاملNash and Stackelberg solutions to general linear-quadratic two-player difference games. II. Open-closed strategies
This paper deals with difference games in which the information structures of the players are not equal. Nash and Stackelberg solutions to deterministic linear-quadratic two-player difference games are presented. The open-closed strategies are considered where one of the players can only use the initial state whereas the other has access to perfect memory information of the state. Stackelberg o...
متن کاملA TRANSITION FROM TWO-PERSON ZERO-SUM GAMES TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITH FUZZY PAYOFFS
In this paper, we deal with games with fuzzy payoffs. We proved that players who are playing a zero-sum game with fuzzy payoffs against Nature are able to increase their joint payoff, and hence their individual payoffs by cooperating. It is shown that, a cooperative game with the fuzzy characteristic function can be constructed via the optimal game values of the zero-sum games with fuzzy payoff...
متن کاملGames with espionage
We consider normal form games in which two players decide on their strategies before the start of play and Player 1 can purchase noisy information about his opponent’s decisions concerning future response policies (i.e., spy on his opponent). We give a full characterization of the set of distributions over the players’ payo¤s that can be induced by such equilibria, as well as describe their wel...
متن کامل